Listen to this article
Continuous testing vs Automated testing are the two phrases that are used as synonyms. But they aren’t synonyms.
It’s the fact that they complement one another, however, they aren’t similar. Both continuous testing & automated testing have a strong smash on continuous delivery and DevOps.
Overall, you can choose any one from Continuous testing vs test automation per your project requirements. Your partner software testing company will be the right source that would suggest the right choice for your project.
However, we would like to bring to your attention the three key differences between continuous testing and testing automation. So, let’s see the article and explore more!
What is Continuous Testing?
Continuous testing is a method focusing on achieving better quality and continuous improvements. It can employ different tools and practices to test the system.
When you implement continuous testing, you execute multiple automated tests to obtain risks and solutions associated with the software.
Not every data that you have is clean, consistent, and consolidated. Hence, you need to take action to remove the risk and improve the quality.
What is Automated Testing/Test Automation?
Automated testing/test automation, utilizes software to manage and automate a range of tasks. Much like automating an assembly line, the thinking behind automating testing processes is to improve efficiency and productivity.
By entrusting repetitive tasks to machines, businesses can achieve higher volumes, faster speeds, and fewer errors. Overall, automated testing enables businesses to optimize throughput and velocity across diverse tasks, driving overall operational excellence.
Let’s learn the key differences between continuous Testing and Test Automation.
Continuous Testing vs. Test Automation: 3 Key Differences
Three main differences between test automation and continuous testing are:
Time, Breadth, and Risk
Let’s understand every point in detail.
Time
The speed at which companies deploy software is one of the competitive features that clients check while hiring a software development company. So, the majority of businesses are using Agile and DevOps to improve their delivery processes.
At first, automated testing was used in the internal systems governed by the waterfall development method. In this approach, companies meticulously control all system aspects and ensure completion before commencing the testing phase. However, with increasing Agile processes, testing must streamline with development, specifically in Agile frameworks.
We know that DevOps and CD are gaining popularity, software deployment range is escalating, demanding instantaneous feedback at each phase. While strong unit tests & smoke tests serve well for apps with minimum rollback, companies prioritizing risk avoidance need comprehensive testing content at high speeds.
Getting this balance necessitates modern testing strategies capable of ensuring the quality between securing your system against unsafe software leveragers, and quick development cycles.
Breadth
Although a company manages to balance the software, it can fail due to some negligible glitches. If any section of the UI/UX fails to fulfill the expectations, you may lose a customer, and eventually damage your brand name as well.
It’s not just about knowing that a UI test passed or a unit test failed. The overall experience of using the app can be impacted by the latest application changes.
To safeguard the end-user experience, building tests that are huge enough to detect when an application update impacts the functionality that users rely on.
Risk
Modern organizations have shifted from just exposing internal apps to users to developing an extensive software system that improves user experiences. For instance, airlines can offer a comprehensive vacation for planning services and extend beyond booking software. This innovation will increase competitiveness, it also amplifies the complex of strong failure points.
The consequences of huge software failure are significant and app-related risks are crucial components of public fin filings. Remarkable failures also lead to an average reduction in stock prices, and hence created loss of billions in the capitalization market.
Moreover, business leaders expect IT leaders to solve these risks seamlessly by focusing on low-level details. Test results may not give insight into release candidate viability without alignment with business risks.
Accurate testing strategies should categorize identifying high-risk members to prevent their deployment. While low-granularity tests remain valuable, augmenting them with risk-focused evaluation is important to secure against detrimental software collapses.
Final verdict – Continuous Testing vs Test Automation
Here’s a small phrase to sum up the whole article:
Test automation ≠ continuous testing
(and)
Continuous testing > test automation in the majority of situations
Also, the teams have achieved fair success with traditional automation testing tools when their companies adopt the latest architecture and delivery methods:
- The constant app change results in more amount of falso corrections and needs a never-ending test maintenance
- They can not make and execute realistic test cases quickly or frequently enough
- They can not give instant insight on whether to release the candidates is risky to go through the pipeline
It is essential to see that no tool or technology can give instant continuous testing. Like DevOps and Agile, continuous testing also needs updates, processes, and techniques. However, trying to improve the associated change in process and people when technology isn’t up to the task. If you want to stay updated with the latest technical trends, bookmark us. Till then, happy reading!
